Parking Lot Accident Lawyer

Comparative Negligence Laws by State

Quick Answer

Most states use comparative negligence, which reduces your compensation by your percentage of fault rather than barring recovery. A minority of states (Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia) use strict contributory negligence, where any fault on your part can bar recovery entirely.

Pure comparative negligence

You can recover damages even if you were mostly at fault. Your award is simply reduced by your percentage of fault. If you were 70% at fault for a backing collision, you can still recover 30% of your damages.

Modified comparative negligence (51% bar)

You can recover damages as long as you were not more than 50% at fault (i.e., 51% bars recovery). A 50/50 finding still allows you to recover half your damages, which makes disputing an insurer's shared-fault assessment worthwhile.

Modified comparative negligence (50% bar)

You can recover damages only if you were less than 50% at fault. If you are found equally (50/50) or more at fault, you recover nothing. Fault percentage matters enormously in parking lot cases, where insurers often open with a 50/50 assessment.

Slight/gross comparative negligence

You can recover only if your negligence was 'slight' compared to the other party's 'gross' negligence, a stricter standard than most comparative negligence states. Disputed parking lot cases here often turn on the quality of the evidence.

Contributory negligence

This is the harshest rule in the country: if you were even 1% at fault, you may be barred from recovering anything. Insurers in contributory negligence states aggressively argue shared fault in parking lot cases, which makes strong evidence and legal representation especially important.

Hurt in a Parking Lot Accident?

Find out in 2 minutes if you have a case. Free, confidential, and no obligation.

100% Free Case ReviewNo Fee Unless You WinAvailable 24/7Nationwide Network
Free Case Review, 2 Minutes